Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463442›Full record

ReviewJOR spine2018

Promise, progress, and problems in whole disc tissue engineering.

Sarah E Gullbrand, Lachlan J Smith, Harvey E Smith, Robert L Mauck

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JOR spine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. JOR spine · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Immuno-Modulatory Effects of Intervertebral Disc Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah E GullbrandTranslational Musculoskeletal Research Center Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Lachlan J SmithTranslational Musculoskeletal Research Center Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Harvey E SmithTranslational Musculoskeletal Research Center Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Robert L MauckTranslational Musculoskeletal Research Center Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-9537-603X
Philadelphia VA Medical Center · US

Funding

RRD VA I01 RX000132RRD VA I01 RX002274RRD VA IK1 RX002445RRD VA IK2 RX001476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intervertebral disc degeneration is frequently implicated as a cause of back and neck pain, which are pervasive musculoskeletal complaints in modern society. For the treatment of end stage disc degeneration, replacement of the disc with a viable, tissue-engineered construct that mimics native disc structure and function is a promising alternative to fusion or mechanical arthroplasty techniques. Substantial progress has been made in the field of whole disc tissue engineering over the past decade, with a variety of innovative designs characterized both in vitro and in vivo in animal models. However, significant barriers to clinical translation remain, including construct size, cell source, culture technique, and the identification of appropriate animal models for preclinical evaluation. Here we review the clinical need for disc tissue engineering, the current state of the field, and the outstanding challenges that will need to be addressed by future work in this area.

Indexed as

animal modelsbiomaterialsbiomechanicsdisc degenerationmesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID31463442
PMCPMC6686799
OpenAlexW2804930583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.