Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463435›Full record

ReviewJOR spine2018

The potential of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for the study and treatment of intervertebral disc pathologies.

Olga Krupkova, Elena Cambria, Lenka Besse, Andrej Besse, Robert Bowles, Karin Wuertz-Kozak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JOR spine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Harnessing CRISPR potential for intervertebral disc regeneration strategies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A crucial exosome-related gene pair (Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Genetic Therapy for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olga KrupkovaDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology Institute for Biomechanics ETH Zurich Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2041-8557
Elena CambriaDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology Institute for Biomechanics ETH Zurich Switzerland.
Lenka BesseDepartment of Oncology and Hematology Cantonal Hospital St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland.
Andrej BesseDepartment of Oncology and Hematology Cantonal Hospital St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland.
Robert BowlesDepartment of Bioengineering University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah.
Karin Wuertz-KozakDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology Institute for Biomechanics ETH Zurich Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3281-4629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system has emerged as a powerful tool for mammalian genome engineering. In basic and translational intervertebral disc (IVD) research, this technique has remarkable potential to answer fundamental questions on pathway interactions, to simulate IVD pathologies, and to promote drug development. Furthermore, the precisely targeted CRISPR/Cas9 gene therapy holds promise for the effective and targeted treatment of degenerative disc disease and low back pain. In this perspective, we provide an overview of recent CRISPR/Cas9 advances stemming from/with transferability to IVD research, outline possible treatment approaches for degenerative disc disease, and discuss current limitations that may hinder clinical translation.

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9degenerative disc diseaseintervertebral disclow back paintargeted genome engineering

Identifiers

PMID31463435
PMCPMC6686831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.