Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463364›Full record

ArticleJournal of technology in behavioral science2019

Beliefs about Using Smartphones for Health Behavior Change: An Elicitation Study with Overweight and Obese Rural Women.

Danielle Symons Downs, Joshua M Smyth, Kristin E Heron, Mark E Feinberg, Marianne Hillemeier, Frank T Materia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of technology in behavioral science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle Symons DownsExercise Psychology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Penn State University.ORCID 0000-0003-1294-9742
Joshua M SmythDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, Penn State University.
Kristin E HeronDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University.
Mark E FeinbergPrevention Center Research, Penn State University.
Marianne HillemeierDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, Penn State University.
Frank T MateriaDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, Penn State University.
Pennsylvania State University · USOld Dominion University · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002016 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THOMAS, GAIL D. · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
Control Systems Engineering for Optimizing a Prenatal Weight Gain InterventionR01HL119245 · NHLBI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI DOWNS, DANIELLE SYMONS · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increased interest in developing mobile technology-based interventions, little research has examined preferences and beliefs about using smartphones for psychosocial or health behavior change interventions, particularly among women with overweight/obesity residing in rural communities. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to examine the beliefs of pre- and interconceptional women about using smartphones and to examine the extent to which women's preferences for using smartphones changed as a result of participating in study interviews.

methodsForty women (

resultsWomen identified advantages of using smartphones for behavioral interventions, including being convenient, useful, and able to provide social support. Primary disadvantages were annoyances and needing technology support for phone problems. Participating in interviews also resulted in significant improvements in participant willingness to use smartphones in health behavior change interventions. DISCUSSION: The study findings highlight the importance of understanding beliefs about using smartphones before designing effective smartphone-based interventions, especially for use with pre- and interconceptional women with overweight/obesity who may have unique challenges with study adherence. These findings also suggest beliefs about smartphone utility can be improved over the course of a brief interview that taps into technology-related preferences.

conclusionIdentifying advantages/disadvantages of smartphone use can inform intervention design. Future research should explore how to capitalize on strategies that enable the benefits of technology (e.g., convenience, social support) while minimizing participant barriers (e.g., distractions) to promote behavior change and facilitate intervention compliance.

Indexed as

interventionmobile phone technologypreconception

Identifiers

PMID31463364
PMCPMC6713284
OpenAlexW2904612322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.