Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463362›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2019

Impact of intracoronary contrast injection pressure on reperfusion during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A prospective randomized pilot study.

Kresimir Stambuk, Tomislav Krcmar, Ivan Zeljkovic

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03445364 (Impact of Coronary Dye Injection Pressure on Myocardial Reperfusion During the Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03445364 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Coronary Dye Injection Pressure on Myocardial Reperfusion During the Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital Sestre MilosrdniceRan2010 to 2010Enrolled100ConditionsMyocardial Reperfusion, STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionArmsUse of different injection pressure during primary PCI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. No-reflow phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction: RelieveInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kresimir StambukClinic for Cardiovascular Medicine, Hospital for Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiology Magdalena, Ljudevita Gaja 2, 49217 Krapinske Toplice, Croatia.
Tomislav KrcmarDepartment of Cardiology, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Vinogradska cesta 29, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivan ZeljkovicDepartment of Cardiology, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Vinogradska cesta 29, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
University Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistal embolization of plaque and thrombotic debris in the infarct-related artery (IRA) may lead to microvascular obstruction resulting in impaired myocardial reperfusion.The aim of the study was to assess the impact of contrast injection pressure in IRA, during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), on myocardial reperfusion in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

methodsThis prospective, randomized, open label, pilot trial evaluated acute STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI, with blinded evaluation of end points. Patients were assigned to higher injection pressure group A (550 pound/inch

resultsStudy included 100 consecutive acute STEMI patients, with median age of 63 (56-72) years (77% men) who were randomized to higher and lower injection pressure group. Baseline demographic, clinical and angiographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. There were no significant differences between the study groups regarding difference in achieved MBG 3 (33 vs 36 patients,

conclusionThere was no impact of lower intracoronary contrast injection pressure in comparison to higher injection pressure, during primary PCI in patients with acute STEMI, on myocardial reperfusion as assessed by MBG or ST segment changes in the ECG.The study was registered at registry ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number: NCT03445364, on February 26th 2018.

Indexed as

Intracoronary pressureMyocardial blush gradeNo-reflow phenomenonPrimary PCIReperfusionSTEMI

Identifiers

PMID31463362
PMCPMC6709366
OpenAlexW2969313169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.