ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2019
Preventive Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy: Meta-analysis of Randomised Trials.
Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contemporary Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Noninvasive Programmed Stimulation Predicts Arrhythmia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy With ICDs for Primary Prevention.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2026Article
- Early vs. deferred catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients of ischaemic substrate: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Cutting into the storm: timing, benefits, and risks of ventricular tachycardia ablation across different arrhythmia substrates.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- The challenge of optimising ablation lesions in catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.Journal of arrhythmia · 2021Review
- Outcome of catheter ablation in the very elderly-insights from a large matched analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2020Article
- Preventive versus deferred catheter ablation of myocardial infarct-associated ventricular tachycardia: A meta-analysis.Heart rhythm O2 · 2020Article
- How personalized heart modeling can help treatment of lethal arrhythmias: A focus on ventricular tachycardia ablation strategies in post-infarction patients.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) aims to treat the underlying arrhythmia substrate to prevent ICD therapies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of VT ablation prior to or at the time of secondary prevention ICD implantation in patients with coronary artery disease, as compared with deferred VT ablation. Based on a systematic literature search, three randomised trials were considered eligible for inclusion in this analysis, and data on the number of patients with appropriate ICD shocks, appropriate ICD therapy, arrhythmic storm, death and major complications were extracted from each study. On pooled analysis, there was a significant reduction of appropriate ICD shocks (OR 2.58; 95% CI [1.54-4.34]; p<0.001) and appropriate ICD therapies (OR 2.04; 95% CI [1.15-3.61]; p=0.015) in patients undergoing VT ablation at the time of ICD implantation without significant differences with respect to complications (OR 1.39; 95% CI [0.43-4.51]; p=0.581). Mortality did not differ between both groups (OR 1.30; 95% CI [0.60-2.45]; p=0.422). Preventive catheter ablation of VT in patients with coronary heart disease at the time of secondary prevention ICD implantation results in a significant reduction of appropriate ICD shocks and any appropriate ICD therapy compared with patients without or with deferred VT ablation. No significant difference with respect to complications or mortality was observed between both treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.