Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463054›Full record

ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2019

Preventive Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy: Meta-analysis of Randomised Trials.

Roland R Tilz, Charlotte Eitel, Evgeny Lyan, Kivanc Yalin, Spyridon Liosis, Julia Vogler, Ben Brueggemann, Ingo Eitel, Christian Heeger, Ahmed AlTurki and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 10 countries.

Roland R TilzUniversity Heart Centre Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Charlotte EitelUniversity Heart Centre Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Evgeny LyanUniversity Heart Centre Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Kivanc YalinUniversity Heart Centre Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Spyridon LiosisUniversity Heart Centre Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Julia VoglerUniversity Heart Centre Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Ben BrueggemannUniversity Heart Centre Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Ingo EitelUniversity Heart Centre Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Christian HeegerUniversity Heart Centre Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Ahmed AlTurkiDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre Montreal, Canada.
Riccardo ProiettiDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua Padua, Italy.
McGill University Health Centre · CAPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Padua · ITUsak University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) aims to treat the underlying arrhythmia substrate to prevent ICD therapies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of VT ablation prior to or at the time of secondary prevention ICD implantation in patients with coronary artery disease, as compared with deferred VT ablation. Based on a systematic literature search, three randomised trials were considered eligible for inclusion in this analysis, and data on the number of patients with appropriate ICD shocks, appropriate ICD therapy, arrhythmic storm, death and major complications were extracted from each study. On pooled analysis, there was a significant reduction of appropriate ICD shocks (OR 2.58; 95% CI [1.54-4.34]; p<0.001) and appropriate ICD therapies (OR 2.04; 95% CI [1.15-3.61]; p=0.015) in patients undergoing VT ablation at the time of ICD implantation without significant differences with respect to complications (OR 1.39; 95% CI [0.43-4.51]; p=0.581). Mortality did not differ between both groups (OR 1.30; 95% CI [0.60-2.45]; p=0.422). Preventive catheter ablation of VT in patients with coronary heart disease at the time of secondary prevention ICD implantation results in a significant reduction of appropriate ICD shocks and any appropriate ICD therapy compared with patients without or with deferred VT ablation. No significant difference with respect to complications or mortality was observed between both treatment strategies.

Indexed as

catheter ablationmeta-analysisVentricular arrhythmias

Identifiers

PMID31463054
PMCPMC6702470
OpenAlexW2966711715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.