Pheromone-binding proteins based phylogenetics and phylogeography of

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Hi-C guided genome assembly and karyotype analysis of the Indian population of Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) set the stage for structural and functional genomic insights.BMC genomic data · 2026
   Article
2. Ostrinia furnacalis PBP2 solution NMR structure: Insight into ligand binding and release mechanisms.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
   Article
3. Effect of Pheromone-Mediated Mating Disruption on Pest Population Density ofInsects · 2020
   Article
4. Pheromone-binding proteins based phylogenetics and phylogeography ofEcology and evolution · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as