Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31462990›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2019

Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7-14 years, Protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Susanne Lynge, Jan Hartvigsen, Henrik Wulff Christensen, Werner Vach, Lise Hestbaek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02684916 (Effectiveness of Chiropractic Manipulation Treatment Versus Placebo Manipulation on Children Aged 7-14 Years With Headache and Musculoskeletal Problems. A Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02684916 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Chiropractic Manipulation Treatment Versus Placebo Manipulation on Children Aged 7-14 Years With Headache and Musculoskeletal Problems. A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical BiomechanicsRan2015 to 2019Enrolled200ConditionsChronic HeadacheArmsChiropractic treatment, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Susanne LyngePrivate chiropractic practice, Vivaldisvej 6, 9700 Broenderslev, Denmark.
Jan Hartvigsen2Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Henrik Wulff Christensen2Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Werner Vach2Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Lise Hestbaek2Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1620-4556
University of Southern Denmark · DKNordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik · DKUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Headache is one of the most common pain symptoms in childhood having a negative impact on many aspects of the lives of affected children, both short-term and long-term. Therefore, it is important to document safe and effective treatment options. Chiropractic spinal manipulation is a commonly used treatment option for these patients, although there are no randomized clinical trials documenting the effectiveness of this in pediatric headache. However, there is moderate evidence for effectiveness of spinal manipulation for adults with tension-type and cervicogenic headaches.This paper describes the protocol for a two-armed randomized superiority clinical trial aiming to investigate the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation in the treatment of recurrent headache in children aged 7-14. Methods: Children with weekly headaches for at least six months will be included if they have indications for chiropractic manipulation. The participants will be randomized to either chiropractic manipulation or sham manipulation. Both children and parents will be blinded for allocation. There will be 100 children in each arm and they will answer weekly text messages four weeks prior to treatment and during a four months treatment period. Potential primary outcomes are weekly number of headaches, intensity of headache, medication use and global perceived effect. Secondary outcomes include side-effects and headache status after one year.An initial outcome data analysis will be performed to inform the choice of primary outcome (adaptive design). Intervention effects will be reported as the difference in mean values between the two treatment arms, Cohen's effect size and numbers needed to treat. Discussion: A major strength of this study is its pragmatic nature, where the active treatment group receives chiropractic manipulation according to their individual needs, while both groups continue their use of medication for headache according to their pre-trial habits. Other strengths include an elaborate sham procedure and the weekly outcome reports, reducing recall bias.If it is possible to develop effective treatment for headache in children, a life course of recurring problems may be altered with potential positive implications for both individuals and society. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02684916.

Indexed as

HeadacheManipulation, ChiropracticAdolescentAdultChildEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleManipulation, SpinalPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignChildrenChiropracticHeadacheManipulationManipulative therapyPlaceboRecurrentSham

Identifiers

PMID31462990
PMCPMC6706934
OpenAlexW2969827695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.