Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31462809›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2019

Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic and adductor canal block for below-knee surgeries in high-risk patients.

B K Arjun, R S Prijith, G M Sreeraghu, M C Narendrababu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07594197 (Evaluation of Sensory and Motor Blockade of Ultrasound-Guided Parasacral Ischial Plane Block in Lower Extremity Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07594197 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Sensory and Motor Blockade of Ultrasound-Guided Parasacral Ischial Plane Block in Lower Extremity Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsPatients Scheduled for Elective Lower Extremity Surgery, Ages 18-80, ASA I-III, Patients Operated on Under Regional AnesthesiaArmsParasacral Ischial Plan Block, Sacral plexus block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B K ArjunDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sapthagiri Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
R S PrijithDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center (KIMS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
G M SreeraghuDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center (KIMS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
M C NarendrababuDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center (KIMS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsCentral neuraxial block and general anaesthesia in patients with significant comorbidities are associated with considerable peri-operative morbidity and mortality. This study aims to delineate peripheral nerve block as a suitable alternative technique in high-risk patients posted for below-knee surgery.

methodsTwenty patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologist's (ASA) physical status grade III and IV, aged 30-80 years, scheduled for below-knee surgery from May 2018 to February 2019 were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients received ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic block with 20 ml 0.5% ropivacaine and adductor canal block with 10 ml 0.375% ropivacaine. The peripheral nerve block success rate, sensory and motor block onset time, haemodynamic parameters, duration of post-operative analgesia and patient's satisfaction were recorded. Descriptive statistics of the study were calculated and the data was analysed using an SPSS statistics 21.0 program.

resultSurgery was performed successfully with no additional analgesic requirement in all patients. The mean duration for sensory and motor block onset time was 3.35 ± 0.49 (mean ± standard deviation) and 4.65 ± 0.48 (mean ± standard deviation) minutes respectively. Haemodynamic parameters were maintained stable throughout the procedure. The average duration of postoperative analgesia was 7.5 ± 0.8 (mean ± standard deviation) hours. Patient overall satisfaction as assessed, by three-point Lickert's scale, was satisfactory.

conclusionUltrasound-guided combined popliteal sciatic and adductor canal block is an effective alternative anaesthetic technique for below-knee surgeries with stability of haemodynamic parameters and pain management in high-risk patients.

Indexed as

Adductor canalbelow-knee surgerypopliteal sciaticultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31462809
PMCPMC6691641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.