Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31462653›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Effects of culture method on response to EGFR therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells.

Jose M Ayuso, Ross Vitek, Adam D Swick, Melissa C Skala, Kari B Wisinski, Randall J Kimple, Paul F Lambert, David J Beebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jose M AyusoMorgridge Institute for Research, 330N Orchard street, Madison, WI, USA.
Ross VitekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Adam D SwickDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Melissa C SkalaMorgridge Institute for Research, 330N Orchard street, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6320-7637
Kari B WisinskiThe University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Randall J KimpleThe University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-8000
Paul F LambertDepartment of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.
David J BeebeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. djbeebe@wisc.edu.

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Visualizing EBV and HCMV DNA Dynamics During InfectionP01CA022443 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WILLIAM M. SUGDEN · 1985 to 2026
$53.1M
Project 4: Role of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase AXL in HNSCC Therapy ResistanceP50DE026787 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HARARI, PAUL M · 2016 to 2020
$10.8M
Defining Drivers of HPV-associated CarcinogenesisR35CA210807 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Paul F. Lambert · 2017 to 2026
$9.2M
Optical imaging of pancreas cancer organoids for drug development and personalized treatmentR01CA211082 · NCI · MORGRIDGE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH, INC. · PI SKALA, MELISSA CAROLINE · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
Cellular-level Optical Metabolic Imaging to Predict Drug Response in CancerR01CA185747 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SKALA, MELISSA CAROLINE · 2014 to 2019
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA022443NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA185747NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211082NCI NIH HHS R35 CA210807NIDCR NIH HHS P50 DE026787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The EGFR pathway plays a critical role in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Targeted therapies against the EGFR are utilized as a treatment for HNSCCC. However, patient response is heterogeneous and molecular biomarkers are lacking to predict patient response. Therefore, functional assays where drug response is directly evaluated in tumor cells are an interesting alternative. Previous studies have shown that experimental conditions modify the drug response observed in functional assays. Thus, in this work the influence of the culture environment on response to Cetuximab (EGFR monoclonal antibody) and AZD8055 (mTOR inhibitor) was evaluated. HNSCC UM-SCC-1 and UM-SCC-47 cells were cultured in 2D monoculture and compared with: 2D co-culture with cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF); 3D culture in collagen hydrogels; and 3D culture in tumor spheroids. The results showed UM-SCC-1 drug response significantly changed in the different culture environments; leading to an increase in drug resistance in the CAF co-culture and the 3D spheroids. Conversely, UM-SCC-47 exhibited a more constant drug response across culture conditions. In conclusion, this work highlights the importance of culture conditions that modulate response to EGFR pathway inhibition.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesHead and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasm ProteinsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckCell Line, TumorCetuximabDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleMorpholinesSignal TransductionSpheroids, Cellular(5-(2,4-bis((3S)-3-methylmorpholin-4-yl)pyrido(2,3-d)pyrimidin-7-yl)-2-methoxyphenyl)methanolCetuximabEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsMorpholinesNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31462653
PMCPMC6713778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.