Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31462640›Full record

ReviewNature communications2019

Moving beyond the glial scar for spinal cord repair.

Elizabeth J Bradbury, Emily R Burnside

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 430 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
430citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

430 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Beyond Scar Removal: Reprogramming the Glial Scar for Neural Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

370 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth J BradburyKing's College London, Regeneration Group, The Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London, SE1 1UL, UK. elizabeth.bradbury@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4252-0234
Emily R BurnsideKing's College London, Regeneration Group, The Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London, SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-0602

Funding

A chemical approach to elucidating the structure-function relationships of chondronitin sulfate glycosaminoglycansR01GM093627 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HSIEH-WILSON, LINDA C · 2010 to 2018
$3.6M
Medical Research Council G1002055Medical Research Council MR/P012418/1Medical Research Council MR/R005532/1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic spinal cord injury results in severe and irreversible loss of function. The injury triggers a complex cascade of inflammatory and pathological processes, culminating in formation of a scar. While traditionally referred to as a glial scar, the spinal injury scar in fact comprises multiple cellular and extracellular components. This multidimensional nature should be considered when aiming to understand the role of scarring in limiting tissue repair and recovery. In this Review we discuss recent advances in understanding the composition and phenotypic characteristics of the spinal injury scar, the oversimplification of defining the scar in binary terms as good or bad, and the development of therapeutic approaches to target scar components to enable improved functional outcome after spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesCicatrixHumansInflammationNeurogliaSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord RegenerationWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID31462640
PMCPMC6713740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.