Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31462473›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Survey on available treatment for acute kidney injury in the Southern African Development Community and Nigeria: are we ready for zero deaths by 2025 in sub-Saharan Africa?

Erika Jones, Brian L Rayner, Emmanuel E Effa, Ikechi G Okpechi, Michael Schmitz, Peter J Heering

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erika JonesKidney and Hypertension Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3569-3498
Brian L RaynerKidney and Hypertension Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa brian.rayner@uct.ac.za.
Emmanuel E EffaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Ikechi G OkpechiKidney and Hypertension Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Michael SchmitzNephrology, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Solingen, Germany.
Peter J HeeringNephrology, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Solingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe International Society of Nephrology (ISN) has called for zero deaths by 2025. This survey aimed to determine the preparedness of Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries and Nigeria to heed this call.

settingA questionnaire was emailed to facilities, where renal replacement therapy is available; to determine type of services available; quality of care and identify clinicians involved.

participantsClinicians and administrators involved in the care of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) completed the questionnaire.

resultsCompleted questionnaires were received from 12 of the 15 SADC countries and Nigeria, covering 48 service providers. The government provided partial funding for dialysis in 41.7% of services. There was no funding for acute dialysis in two countries. Interdisciplinary teams in 72.9% of hospitals covered the intensive care units (ICUs), which included at least one nephrologist in 75%. Only 77% were able to provide dialysis in ICU. Intermittent haemodialysis was the most common modality available (91.7% of facilities), sustained low-efficiency dialysis in 50%, continuous therapies in 35% and peritoneal dialysis in 33.3%. Almost half (47.9%) of the sites were limited to one mode of dialysis and unable to care for severely ill patients. The clinical status was used to initiate and monitor dialysis, with very few sites having clear written standard operating procedures.

conclusionIn the 16 countries surveyed, the majority had limited ability to provide comprehensive dialysis programmes for patients with AKI due to lack of facilities and government funding. Additionally, nephrologists are scarce; modes of dialysis are limited; as is the care for severely ill patients and lack of standard operating procedures. Resources, training and funding need to be made available to create universal coverage of dialysis for AKI. The ISN goal of providing renal replacement therapy to all by 2025 is unlikely to be achieved in SADC and Nigeria.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAfrica South of the SaharaContinuous Renal Replacement TherapyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntermittent Renal Replacement TherapyNigeriaPatient AcuityPatient Care TeamPeritoneal DialysisPractice Guidelines as TopicRenal Replacement TherapySurveys and Questionnairesacute kidney injuryafricadialysissurvey

Identifiers

PMID31462473
PMCPMC6720132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.