Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31462421›Full record

ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2019

Patient safety incidents in advance care planning for serious illness: a mixed-methods analysis.

Toby Dinnen, Huw Williams, Sarah Yardley, Simon Noble, Adrian Edwards, Peter Hibbert, Joyce Kenkre, Andrew Carson-Stevens

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06565169 (Improving Primary Care Clinician's Advance Care Planning Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06565169 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Improving Primary Care Clinician's Advance Care Planning Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2025 to 2028Enrolled120ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes), AgingArmsPrimary Care Team Advance Care Planning With People with Alzheimer's Disease or a Related Dementia Training, Care as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A good death is much more than anticipatory drugs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Toby DinnenDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2284-7005
Huw WilliamsDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Sarah YardleyMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.
Simon NobleMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5425-2383
Adrian EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Peter HibbertAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Joyce KenkreFaculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, Wales.
Andrew Carson-StevensDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK carson-stevensap@cardiff.ac.uk.
Cardiff University · GBMacquarie University · AUMarie Curie · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of South Wales · GB

Funding

Marie Curie MC 2016-06Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-CMarie Curie MCCC-FCO-17-CA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdvance care planning (ACP) is essential for patient-centred care in the last phase of life. There is little evidence available on the safety of ACP. This study characterises and explores patient safety incidents arising from ACP processes in the last phase of life.

methodsThe National Reporting and Learning System collates patient safety incident reports across England and Wales. We performed a keyword search and manual review to identify relevant reports, April 2005-December 2015. Mixed-methods, combining structured data coding, exploratory and thematic analyses were undertaken to describe incidents, underlying causes and outcomes, and identify areas for improvement.

resultsWe identified 70 reports in which ACP caused a patient safety incident across three error categories: (1) ACP not completed despite being appropriate (23%, n=16). (2) ACP completed but not accessible or miscommunicated between professionals (40%, n=28). (3) ACP completed and accessible but not followed (37%, n=26). Themes included staff lacking the knowledge, confidence, competence or belief in trustworthiness of prior documentation to create or enact ACP. Adverse outcomes included cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts contrary to ACP, other inappropriate treatment and/or transfer or admission.

conclusionThis national analysis identifies priority concerns and questions whether it is possible to develop strong system interventions to ensure safety and quality in ACP without significant improvement in human-dependent issues in social programmes such as ACP. Human-dependent issues (ie, varying patient, carer and professional understanding, and confidence in enacting prior ACP when required) should be explored in local contexts alongside systems development for ACP documentation.

Indexed as

Clinical decisionsCommunication

Identifiers

PMID31462421
PMCPMC9380496
OpenAlexW2970049358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.