Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31462321›Full record

ArticleJournal of physiological anthropology2019

Non-visual effects of diurnal exposure to an artificial skylight, including nocturnal melatonin suppression.

Akira Yasukouchi, Takafumi Maeda, Kazuyoshi Hara, Hiroyuki Furuune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physiological anthropology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Blue Light-Ocular and Systemic Damaging Effects: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Aging, frailty, and design of built environments.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Akira YasukouchiDepartment of Human Science, Faculty of Design, Kyushu University, 4-9-1, Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan. physioanthropol@yahoo.co.jp.
Takafumi MaedaDepartment of Human Science, Faculty of Design, Kyushu University, 4-9-1, Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9073-2771
Kazuyoshi HaraLa Forêt Engineering Co., Ltd, Roppongi Annex 7F, 6-7-6, Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-0032, Japan.
Hiroyuki FuruuneLa Forêt Engineering Co., Ltd, Roppongi Annex 7F, 6-7-6, Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-0032, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, more consideration is being given to the beneficial effects of lighting on the maintenance and promotion of the health and well-being of office occupants in built environments. A new lighting technology using Rayleigh scattering has made it possible to simulate a blue sky. However, to date, no studies have examined the possible beneficial effects of such artificial skylights. The aims of this study were to examine the non-visual effects of artificial skylights and conventional fluorescent lights in a simulated office environment and to clarify the feature effects of the artificial skylights.

methodsParticipants were 10 healthy male adults. Non-visual effects were evaluated based on brain arousal levels (α-wave ratio and contingent negative variation [CNV]), autonomic nervous activity (heart rate variability [HRV]), work performance, and subjective responses during daytime exposure to either an artificial skylight or fluorescent lights, as well as nocturnal melatonin secretion.

resultsSubjective evaluations of both room lighting-related "natural" and "attractive" items and the "connected to nature" item were significantly higher with the skylight than with the fluorescent lights. Cortical arousal levels obtained from the early component of the CNV amplitude were significantly lower with the skylight than with the fluorescent lights, whereas α-wave ratio and work performance were similar between the two light sources. The HRV evaluation showed that sympathetic nerve tone was lower and parasympathetic nerve tone was higher, both significantly, for the skylight than for the fluorescent lights during daytime. Nocturnal melatonin secretion was significantly greater before and during light exposure at night under the daytime skylight than under the fluorescent lights.

conclusionsOur results suggest that artificial skylights have some advantages over conventional fluorescent lights in maintaining ordinary work performance during daytime with less psychological and physiological stress. The findings also suggest that the artificial skylights would enable built environments to maintain long-term comfort and productivity.

Indexed as

AdultArousalCircadian RhythmElectrocardiographyHeart RateHumansLightLightingMaleMelatoninSalivaYoung AdultMelatoninArousal levelArtificial skylightFluorescent lightMelatonin secretionNon-visual effectOffice

Identifiers

PMID31462321
PMCPMC6714349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.