Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31462310›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Si-ni-tang (a Chinese herbal formula) for improving immunofunction in sepsis: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Ruifeng Zeng, Yi Zheng, Rongrong Fan, Gengbiao Zhou, Yan Zhang, Shutao Mai, Dongping Xie, Yanna Weng, Jiongdong Du, Yun Han and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02777606 (The Efficacy of Si-Ni-Tang), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02777606 nacompletednot on this map

The Efficacy of Si-Ni-Tang (a Chinese Herbal Formula) for Severe Sepsis

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineRan2016 to 2019Enrolled50ConditionsSevere SepsisArmsSi-Ni-Tang
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruifeng ZengThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yi ZhengFoshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Rongrong FanThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Gengbiao ZhouThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yan ZhangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shutao MaiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dongping XieThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yanna WengThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiongdong DuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yun HanThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fang LaiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. drlaifang@foxmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6380-1257
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNFoshan Hospital of TCM · CN

Funding

Guangdong Science and Technology Department 2014A020212280Guangdong Science and Technology Department 2016A020215196National Natural Science Foundation of China 81703856Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2017ZC0133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunologic derangement may be the critical pathophysiologic mechanism in sepsis, and immunotherapy might be a potential new treatment. Si-ni-tang (SNT), an ancient Chinese herbal formula documented in Shanghan Lun, has been used for treating severe sepsis for thousands of years. Research shows that it may have a therapeutic benefit for sepsis. This study will evaluate the feasibility of testing the effects of SNT on immune function in sepsis patients. METHODS/

designThis is a pilot randomized controlled study. Eligible sepsis patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit will be randomly allocated to the control group or the SNT group. Both groups will receive standard therapy according to the recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. In addition, the SNT group will receive SNT (150 mL per day for 3 days) orally or by gastric tube, while the control group will receive 150 mL of normal saline. The primary outcome is to assess the feasibility of this treatment. The secondary outcomes include: (1) immune function measured by monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR (mHLA-DR) expression, procalcitonin, and the ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ T lymphocytes and (2) other clinical data, such as the 28-day all-cause mortality, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, both of the latter on days 0 and 3. DISCUSSION: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of testing the efficacy of SNT for treating sepsis when used as an adjunctive treatment with the standard therapy recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02777606 . Registered on 22 June 2016. Retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaDrugs, Chinese HerbalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisDrugs, Chinese HerbalImmunologic Factorssini tangChinese herbal medicineimmune functionProtocolSepsisSi-ni-tang (SNT)

Identifiers

PMID31462310
PMCPMC6714400
OpenAlexW2970502878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.