Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31462071›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation2019

Rat Facial Nerve Regeneration with Human Immature Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

Daniel Martinez Saez, Robson Tetsuo Sasaki, Daniel de Oliveira Martins, Marucia Chacur, Irina Kerkis, Marcelo Cavenaghi Pereira da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Martinez SaezDepartment of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Robson Tetsuo SasakiDepartment of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel de Oliveira MartinsDepartament of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Sciences - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marucia ChacurDepartament of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Sciences - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Irina KerkisDepartment of Genetics, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Cavenaghi Pereira da SilvaDepartment of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial paralysis can result in severe implications for the patients. However, stem cell biology has become an important field in regenerative medicine since the discovery and characterization of mesenchymal stem cells. Our aim was to evaluate the regeneration after facial nerve crush injury and application of human immature dental pulp stem cells (iDPSC). For this study 70 Wistar rats underwent a unilateral facial nerve crush injury and were divided into two groups: Group I (GI): Crushed; Group II (GII): Crushed and iDPSC, and distributed into study periods of 3, 7, 14, 21, and 42 postoperative days. Facial nerve regeneration was analyzed via functional recovery of whisker movement, histomorphometric analysis, and immunoblotting assay. The results show that GII had complete functional recovery at 14 days, while GI recovered after 42 days. Also, regarding the facial nerve trunk, GII presented histological improvement, evidencing better axonal and structural organization of the myelin sheath, and exhibited statistically higher values for the outer and inner perimeters and g-ratio. Nevertheless, GI exhibited statistically higher values for the thickness of myelin sheath. In the buccal branch, no differences were observed for all parameters between groups. At 42 days, both groups GI and GII were close to the levels observed for the control group. Concerning nerve growth factor expression, GII exhibited statistically greater values (

Indexed as

Facial NerveFacial Nerve InjuriesNerve RegenerationStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsDental PulpHeterograftsHumansRatsRats, WistarStem Cellsdeciduous teethfacial nervenerve injuriesstem cells

Identifiers

PMID31462071
PMCPMC6923557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.