Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31461997›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2019

Empathic Accuracy in Chronic Pain: Exploring Patient and Informal Caregiver Differences and Their Personality Correlates.

Carlos Suso-Ribera, Verónica Martínez-Borba, Alejandro Viciano, Francisco Javier Cano-García, Azucena García-Palacios

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Becoming a secondary actor of one's own life: A qualitative study of the experiences of informal caregivers in the care of people with chronic pain.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Suso-RiberaDepartment of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments, Jaume I University, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain. susor@uji.es.
Verónica Martínez-BorbaDepartment of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments, Jaume I University, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Alejandro VicianoDepartment of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments, Jaume I University, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Francisco Javier Cano-GarcíaDepartment of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments, University of Seville, 41018 Seville, Spain.
Azucena García-PalaciosDepartment of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments, Jaume I University, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Universitat Jaume I · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España FPU-AP2010-5585Universitat Jaume I POSDOC/2016/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSocial factors have demonstrated to affect pain intensity and quality of life of pain patients, such as social support or the attitudes and responses of the main informal caregiver. Similarly, pain has negative consequences on the patient's social environment. However, it is still rare to include social factors in pain research and treatment. This study compares patient and caregivers' accuracy, as well as explores personality and health correlates of empathic accuracy in patients and caregivers. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study comprised 292 chronic pain patients from the Pain Clinic of the Vall d'Hebron Hospital in Spain (main age = 59.4 years; 66.8% females) and their main informal caregivers (main age = 53.5 years; 51.0% females; 68.5% couples).

resultsPatients were relatively inaccurate at estimating the interference of pain on their counterparts (t = 2.16; p = 0.032), while informal caregivers estimated well the patient's status (all differences p > 0.05). Empathic accuracy on patient and caregiver status did not differ across types of relationship (i.e., couple or other; all differences p > 0.05). Sex differences in estimation only occurred for disagreement in pain severity, with female caregivers showing higher overestimation (t = 2.18; p = 0.030). Patients' health status and caregivers' personality were significant correlates of empathic accuracy. Overall, estimation was poorer when patients presented higher physical functioning. Similarly, caregiver had more difficulties in estimating the patient's pain interference as patient general and mental health increased (r = 0.16, p = 0.008, and r = 0.15, p = 0.009, respectively). Caregiver openness was linked to a more accurate estimation of a patient's status (r = 0.20, p < 0.001), while caregiver agreeableness was related to a patient's greater accuracy of their caregivers' pain interference (r = 0.15, p = 0.009).

conclusionsPatients poorly estimate the impact of their illness compared to caregivers, regardless of their relationship. Some personality characteristics in the caregiver and health outcomes in the patient are associated with empathic inaccuracy, which should guide clinicians when selecting who requires more active training on empathy in pain settings.

Indexed as

EmpathyAdultCaregiversChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPersonalitySex FactorsSocial Supportchronic painempathic accuracyhealth statusinformal caregiverpersonalityspouse

Identifiers

PMID31461997
PMCPMC6780485
OpenAlexW2971203772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.