Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31461958›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Time Coherent Full-Body Poses Estimated Using Only Five Inertial Sensors: Deep versus Shallow Learning.

Frank J Wouda, Matteo Giuberti, Nina Rudigkeit, Bert-Jan F van Beijnum, Mannes Poel, Peter H Veltink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of an Avatar Control on VR Embodiment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frank J WoudaDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands. f.j.wouda@utwente.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4401-4434
Matteo GiubertiRADiCAL Solutions, LLC. 125 West 31st Street, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Nina RudigkeitXsens Technologies B.V., Pantheon 6a, 7521 PR Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5040-4714
Bert-Jan F van BeijnumDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Mannes PoelDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics & Computer Science, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Peter H VeltinkDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.

Funding

Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen 13917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Full-body motion capture typically requires sensors/markers to be placed on each rigid body segment, which results in long setup times and is obtrusive. The number of sensors/markers can be reduced using deep learning or offline methods. However, this requires large training datasets and/or sufficient computational resources. Therefore, we investigate the following research question: "What is the performance of a shallow approach, compared to a deep learning one, for estimating time coherent full-body poses using only five inertial sensors?". We propose to incorporate past/future inertial sensor information into a stacked input vector, which is fed to a shallow neural network for estimating full-body poses. Shallow and deep learning approaches are compared using the same input vector configurations. Additionally, the inclusion of acceleration input is evaluated. The results show that a shallow learning approach can estimate full-body poses with a similar accuracy (~6 cm) to that of a deep learning approach (~7 cm). However, the jerk errors are smaller using the deep learning approach, which can be the effect of explicit recurrent modelling. Furthermore, it is shown that the delay using a shallow learning approach (72 ms) is smaller than that of a deep learning approach (117 ms).

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesAccelerationAlgorithmsGaitHuman BodyHumansMachine LearningMonitoring, PhysiologicMovementNeural Networks, ComputerPosturedeep learninghuman movementinertial motion captureLSTMmachine learningneural networkspose estimationreduced sensor settime coherence

Identifiers

PMID31461958
PMCPMC6749312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.