Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31461500›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Evaluation of balance recovery stability from unpredictable perturbations through the compensatory arm and leg movements (CALM) scale.

Caroline Ribeiro de Souza, Marina Torres Betelli, Patrícia Sayuri Takazono, Julia Ávila de Oliveira, Daniel Boari Coelho, Jacques Duysens, Luis Augusto Teixeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caroline Ribeiro de SouzaHuman Motor Systems Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Centre for Engineering, Modeling and Applied Social Sciences (CECS), Federal University of ABC, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5595-4395
Marina Torres BetelliHuman Motor Systems Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Centre for Engineering, Modeling and Applied Social Sciences (CECS), Federal University of ABC, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3883-8904
Patrícia Sayuri TakazonoHuman Motor Systems Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Centre for Engineering, Modeling and Applied Social Sciences (CECS), Federal University of ABC, São Paulo, Brazil.
Julia Ávila de OliveiraHuman Motor Systems Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Centre for Engineering, Modeling and Applied Social Sciences (CECS), Federal University of ABC, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Boari CoelhoCentre for Engineering, Modeling and Applied Social Sciences (CECS), Federal University of ABC, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jacques DuysensDepartment of Movement Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Luis Augusto TeixeiraHuman Motor Systems Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Centre for Engineering, Modeling and Applied Social Sciences (CECS), Federal University of ABC, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following unpredictable large-magnitude stance perturbations diverse patterns of arm and leg movements are performed to recover balance stability. Stability of these compensatory movements could be properly estimated through qualitative evaluation. In the present study, we present a scale for evaluation of compensatory arm and leg movements (CALM) in response to unpredictable displacements of the support base in the mediolateral direction. We tested the CALM scale for intra- and inter-rater reliability, correlation with kinematics of arm and leg movement amplitudes, and sensitivity to mode (rotation, translation and combined) and magnitude (velocity) of support base displacements, and also to perturbation-based balance training. Results showed significant intra- and inter-rater coefficients of agreement, ranging from moderate (0.46-0.53) for inter-rater reliability in the arm and global scores, to very high (0.87-0.99) for inter-rater leg scores and all intra-rater scores. Analysis showed significant correlation values between scale scores and the respective movement amplitudes both for arm and leg movements. Assessment of sensitivity revealed that the scale discriminated the responses between perturbation modes, platform velocities, in addition to higher balance recovery stability as a result of perturbation-based balance training. As a conclusion, the CALM scale was shown to provide adequate integrative evaluation of compensatory arm and leg movements for balance recovery stability after challenging stance perturbations, with potential application in fall risk prediction.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArmBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyFemaleHumansLegLower ExtremityMaleMovementMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalPostural BalanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31461500
PMCPMC6713348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.