Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31461453›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Beneficial roles of probiotics on the modulation of gut microbiota and immune response in pigs.

Donghyun Shin, Sung Yong Chang, Paul Bogere, KyeongHye Won, Jae-Young Choi, Yeon-Jae Choi, Hak Kyo Lee, Jin Hur, Byung-Yong Park, Younghoon Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. The effects of different doses ofVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  5. Prebiotics and probiotics in animal nutrition: implications for food safety, sustainability, and circular production systems.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donghyun ShinDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Sung Yong ChangDepartment of Animal Science and Institute of Milk Genomics, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Paul BogereDepartment of Agricultural Convergence Technology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3777-1226
KyeongHye WonDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Young ChoiThe Animal Molecular Genetics and Breeding Center, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Yeon-Jae ChoiInternational Agricultural Development and Cooperation Center, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Hak Kyo LeeDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Jin HurCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
Byung-Yong ParkCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
Younghoon KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaeyoung HeoInternational Agricultural Development and Cooperation Center, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9721-8043
Jeonbuk National University · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of probiotics in swine production is widely acknowledged as crucial. However, gaps still remain in the exact roles played by probiotics in modulation of gut microbiota and immune response. This study determined the roles of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strain JDFM LP11in gut microbiota modulation and immune response in weaned piglets. L. plantarum JDFM LP11 increased the population of lactic acid bacteria in feces and enhanced the development of villi in the small intestine. Metagenome analysis showed that microbial diversity and richness (Simpson, Shannon, ACE, Chao1) and the relative abundance of the Firmicutes were higher in weaned piglets fed probiotics. Five bacterial families were different in the relative abundance, especially; Prevotellaceae occupied the largest part of microbial community showed the most difference between two groups. Transcriptome analysis identified 25 differentially expressed genes using RNA-sequencing data of the ileum. Further gene ontology and immune DB analysis determined 8 genes associated with innate defense response and cytokine production. BPI, RSAD2, SLPI, LUM, OLFM4, DMBT1 and C6 genes were down-regulated by probiotic supplementation except PLA2G2A. PICRUSt analysis predicting functional profiling of microbial communities indicated branched amino acid biosynthesis and butyrate metabolism promoting gut development and health were increased by probiotics. Altogether, our data suggest that L. plantarum JDFM LP11 increases the diversity and richness in the microbial community, and attenuates the ileal immune gene expression towards gut inflammation, promoting intestinal development in weaned piglets.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsFemaleImmunityLactiplantibacillus plantarumSwine

Identifiers

PMID31461453
PMCPMC6713323
OpenAlexW2970640684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.