ArticleCytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology2019
Cytology and cell-block immunohistochemistry of circulating tumour cells.
Article in Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances and potentials in platelet-circulating tumor cell crosstalk.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Value of peripheral blood circulating tumor cell detection in the diagnosis of thoracic diseases and the prediction of severity.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Article
- Improvement of the Collection, Maintenance, and Analysis of Neoplastic Cells from Urine Specimens with the Use of CytoMatrix.Methods and protocols · 2021Article
- Cytology and cell-block immunohistochemistry of circulating tumour cells.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe study set out to assess the feasibility of using Parsortix
methodsBlood samples were taken from 50 patients with metastatic carcinoma and 50 healthy volunteers and processed, using a previously published method, to extract CTCs and collect them in a cell-block for routine formalin-fixed paraffin sectioning and immunohistochemistry. The extracted cells were compared with the patients' routine diagnostic samples.
resultsThe samples from the 50 carcinoma patients showed cytokeratin-positive cells in 19 cases. In eight of these, the cytokeratin-positive cells had a similar immunoprofile to the carcinoma in the conventional biopsy or cytology specimen. Some carcinoma patients also had circulating cytokeratin-positive cells that were probably benign epithelial cells and circulating megakaryocytes. Both of these types of cells were also found in healthy volunteers. Processing and initial examination could be completed in 2 days. The full processing cost was approximately £316 per case.
conclusionsCTCs could be extracted from the blood of some patients with metastatic carcinoma and formed into a formalin-fixed cell-block for routine paraffin processing and immunohistochemistry. The specificity of this approach is constrained by the observation that some patients with metastatic carcinoma had circulating cytokeratin-positive cells that were probably benign, and these were also found in healthy volunteers. Circulating megakaryocytes were present in carcinoma patients and healthy volunteers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.