Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31461002›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2019

The Effect of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law on Breast Reconstruction Rates in New York State.

Rose H Fu, Onur Baser, Lu Li, Paul Kurlansky, Jessica Means, Christine H Rohde

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rose H FuFrom New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center; and StatinMed Research.
Onur BaserFrom New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center; and StatinMed Research.
Lu LiFrom New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center; and StatinMed Research.
Paul KurlanskyFrom New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center; and StatinMed Research.
Jessica MeansFrom New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center; and StatinMed Research.
Christine H RohdeFrom New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center; and StatinMed Research.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew York State passed the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law in 2010, mandating discussion of insurance coverage for reconstruction and expedient plastic surgical referral, two significant factors found to affect reconstruction rates. This study examines the impact of this law.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of the New York State Planning and Research Cooperative System database to examine breast reconstruction rates 3 years before and 3 years after law enactment was performed. Difference-interrupted time series models were used to compare trends in the reconstruction rates by sociodemographic factors and provider types.

resultsThe study included 32,452 patients. The number of mastectomies decreased from 6479 in 2008 to 5235 in 2013; the rate of reconstruction increased from 49 percent in 2008 to 62 percent in 2013. This rise was seen across all median income brackets, races, and age groups. When comparing before to after law enactment, the increase in risk-adjusted reconstruction rates was significantly higher for African Americans and elderly patients, but the disparity in reconstruction rates did not change for other races, different income levels, or insurance types. Reconstruction rates were also not significantly different between those treated in various hospital settings.

conclusionsThe aim of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law is to improve reconstruction rates through provider-driven patient education. The authors' data show significant change following law passage in African American and elderly populations, suggesting effectiveness of the law. The New York State Provider Discussion Law may provide a template for other states to model legislation geared toward patient-centered improvement of health outcomes.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMammaplastyAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedNew YorkPatient-Centered CareRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31461002
OpenAlexW2949752647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.