ArticleBiomacromolecules2019
Concurrent Delivery of Soluble and Immobilized Proteins to Recruit and Differentiate Neural Stem Cells.
Article in Biomacromolecules, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulation of dynamic spatiotemporal inflammation by nanomaterials in spinal cord injury.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Neurotrophins and neural stem cells in posttraumatic brain injury repair.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Growth Factor Immobilization Strategies for Musculoskeletal Disorders.Current osteoporosis reports · 2022Review
- Advancing models of neural development with biomaterials.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021Review
- Applications of Functionalized Hydrogels in the Regeneration of the Intervertebral Disc.BioMed research international · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Insufficient endogenous neural stem cell (NSC) migration to injury sites and incomplete replenishment of neurons complicates recovery following central nervous system (CNS) injury. Such insufficient migration can be addressed by delivering soluble chemotactic factors, such as stromal cell-derived factor 1-α (SDF-1α), to sites of injury. However, simply enhancing NSC migration is likely to result in insufficient regeneration, as the cells need to be given additional signals. Immobilized proteins, such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ) can encourage neurogenic differentiation of NSCs. Here, we combined both protein delivery paradigms: soluble SDF-1α delivery to enhance NSC migration alongside covalently tethered IFN-γ to differentiate the recruited NSCs into neurons. To slow the release of soluble SDF-1α, we copolymerized methacrylated heparin with methacrylamide chitosan (MAC), to which we tethered IFN-γ. We found that this hydrogel system could result in soft hydrogels with a ratio of up to 70:30 MAC/heparin by mass, which enabled the continuous release of SDF-1α over a period of 2 weeks. The hydrogels recruited NSCs in vitro over 2 weeks, proportional to their release rate: the 70:30 heparin gels recruited a consistent number of NSCs at each time point, while the formulations with less heparin recruited NSCs at only early time points. After remaining in contact with the hydrogels for 8 days, NSCs successfully differentiated into neurons. CNS regeneration is a complex challenge, and this system provides a foundation to address multiple aspects of that challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.