Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31460504›Full record

ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2019

Phenotypic features of patients with post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome.

Flaviu Rusu, Lorena Mocanu, Dan Lucian Dumitraşcu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Flaviu Rusu2 Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Lorena Mocanu2 Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Dan Lucian Dumitraşcu2 Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough there are many published data in the literature about irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), there are only few data on the long term evolution of patients with post infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) and associated conditions.

aimsThe purpose of our research was to study the evolution of PI-IBS patients in a single tertiary center over a period of four years. STUDY

designOur research was a longitudinal retrospective study.

methodsWe carried out this study based on the survey of the patients records. We recruited two groups of patients: patients with classical IBS and patients with PI-IBS. The IBS diagnosis was established using ROME III criteria, which were used at that time. We compared the two groups of patients by analyzing the demographic data, comorbidities, treatment that was prescribed, and evolution after treatment for a period of 48 month on average.

resultsFrom a total of 592 patients that were diagnosed with IBS between 2013-2016, we identified a subgroup of 64 patients with PI-IBS. These patients were also divided into two subgroups, depending on the main symptoms, 51 with PI-IBS - diarrhea and 13 of them with PI-IBS-constipation. IBS is the most commonly diagnosed among women, 45 patients were women and 15 were men. Regarding the frequency of occurrence of a certain subtype by gender, no significant differences were observed in both IBS and PI-IBS. We noticed a higher incidence of patients residents of an urban community in both groups.The main symptoms were: abdominal pain and bowel disorders (constipation, diarrhea).There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding the onset of the symptoms. From the total of 64 patients with PI-IBS, 88.3% presented a sudden onset of symptoms (mainly abdominal pain) unlike the other group where 81% of them presented a progressive onset, with an insidious progress and sporadic exacerbation. Most patients (65.63%) presented an improvement after the treatment, 25.56% oscillating periods but with a significant decrease of intensity of symptoms, and 7.8% did not show improvement after treatment.The most common associated diseases were depression and anxiety (34.37%).

conclusionIBS is generally present in approximately 11% of the population, with PI-IBS patients accounting for approximately 10% of them. Female gender is more common in both IBS and PI-IBS. Patients with PI-IBS are a burden in the health system in terms of the important economic resources used for diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

associated diseasesIBSPI-IBSsymptomstreatment

Identifiers

PMID31460504
PMCPMC6709955
OpenAlexW2945768089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.