ArticleACS omega2019
In Vivo Biodistribution of Engineered Lipid Microbubbles in Rodents.
Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of ultrasound contrast agent production by sonication and mechanical agitation.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Review
- Toward a Theranostic Approach for the Brain Tumor Toxicity Profile of Polymer-Shelled Microbubbles.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Alternative Strategies for Delivering Immunotherapeutics Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint in Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Effect of Poly(ethylene glycol) Configuration on Microbubble Pharmacokinetics.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- Proteinoid Polymers and Nanocapsules for Cancer Diagnostics, Therapy and Theranostics: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- In Vivo Contrast Imaging of Rat Heart with Carbon Dioxide Foam.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Monitoring the Remodeling of Biohybrid Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts by Multimodal Molecular Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maximal resection of intrinsic brain tumors is a major prognostic factor for survival. Real-time intraoperative imaging tools, including ultrasound (US), are crucial for maximal resection of such tumors. Microbubbles (MBs) are clinically used in daily practice as a contrast agent for ultrasound and can be further developed to serve combined therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. To achieve this goal, we have developed novel MBs conjugated to specific ligands to receptors which are overexpressed in brain tumors. These MBs are designed to target a tumor tissue, visualize it, and deliver therapeutic molecules into it. The objective of this study was to assess the biodistribution of the test items: We used MBs labeled with indocyanine green (MB-ICG) for visualization and MBs conjugated to a cyclic molecule containing the tripeptide Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) labeled with ICG (MB-RGD-ICG) to target brain tumor integrins as the therapeutic tools. Male Sprague Dawley rats received a single dose of each MB preparation. The identification of the MB in various organs was monitored by fluorescence microscopy in anesthetized animals as well as real-time US for brain imaging. Equally sized control groups under identical conditions were used in this study. One control group was used to establish fluorescence background conditions (ICG), and two control groups were used to test autofluorescence from the test items (MBs and MB-RGD). ICG with or without MBs (naked or RGD-modified) was detected in the brain vasculature and also in other organs. The pattern, duration, and intensity of the fluorescence signal could not be differentiated between animals treated with ICG alone and animals treated with microbubbles MBs-ICG or MBs-RGD-ICG. Following MB injection, either naked or combined with RGD, there was a sharp rise in the Doppler signal within seconds of injection in the brain. The signal was mainly located at the choroid plexus, septum pellucidum, and the meninges of the brain. The signal subsided within a few minutes. Injection of saline or ICG alone to respective animals did not result in a similar raised signal. Following a single intravenous administration of MB-ICG and MB-RGD-ICG to rats, the MBs were found to be effectively present in the brain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.