ArticleACS omega2019
Comparison of α-Helix and β-Sheet Structure Adaptation to a Quantum Dot Geometry: Toward the Identification of an Optimal Motif for a Protein Nanoparticle Cover.
Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Effect of Extraction Methods and Preheat Treatments on the Functional Properties of Pumpkin Seed Protein Concentrate.ACS food science & technology · 2025Article
- Article
- QD:Puf Nanohybrids Are Compatible with Studies in Cells.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Biogenic Selenium Nanoparticles: A Fine Characterization to Unveil Their Thermodynamic Stability.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- In Silico Analysis of Tat Exons to Increase the Efficacy of a Nef-Tat-based HIV-1 Vaccine Candidate.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPRArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While quantum dots (QDs) are useful as fluorescent labels, their application in biosciences is limited due to the stability and hydrophobicity of their surface. In this study, we tested two types of proteins for use as a cover for spherical QDs, composed of cadmium selenide. Pumilio homology domain (Puf), which is mostly α-helical, and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain, which is rich in β-sheets, were selected to determine if there is a preference for one of these secondary structure types for nanoparticle covers. The protein sequences were optimized to improve their interaction with the surface of QDs. The solubilization of the apoproteins and their assembly with nanoparticles required the application of a detergent, which was removed in subsequent steps. Finally, only the Puf-based cover was successful enough as a QD hydrophilic cover. We showed that a single polypeptide dimer of Puf, PufPuf, can form a cover. We characterized the size and fluorescent properties of the obtained QD:protein assemblies. We showed that the secondary structure of the Puf proteins was not destroyed upon contact with the QDs. We demonstrated that these assemblies do not promote the formation of reactive oxygen species during illumination of the nanoparticles. The data represent advances in the effort to obtain a stable biocompatible cover for QDs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.