ArticleACS omega2019
Structural Basis and Mechanism for Vindoline Dimers Interacting with α,β-Tubulin.
Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Piperazine Derivatives of Vindoline as Anticancer Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Computational Approaches to the Rational Design of Tubulin-Targeting Agents.Biomolecules · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vinblastine and its derivatives used in clinics as antitumor drugs often cause drug resistance and some serious side effects; thus, it is necessary to study new vinblastine analogues with strong anticancer cytotoxicity and low toxicity. We designed a dimer molecule using two vindoline-bonded dimer vindoline (DVB) and studied its interaction with α,β-tubulin through the double-sided adhesive mechanism to explore its anticancer cytotoxicity. In our work, DVB was docked into the interface between α-tubulin and β-tubulin to construct a complex protein structure, and then it was simulated for 100 ns using the molecular dynamics technology to become a stable and refined complex protein structure. Based on such a refined structure, the quantum chemistry at the level of the MP2/6-31G(d,p) method was used to calculate the binding energies for DVB interacting with respective residues. By the obtained binding energies, the active site residues for interaction with DVB were found. Up to 20 active sites of residues within α,β-tubulin interacting with DVB are labeled in β-Asp179, β-Glu207, β-Tyr210, β-Asp211, β-Phe214, β-Pro222, β-Tyr224, and β-Leu227 and α-Asn249, α-Arg308, α-Lys326, α-Asn329, α-Ala333, α-Thr334, α-Lys336, α-Lys338, α-Arg339, α-Ser340, α-Thr349, and α-Phe351. The total binding energy between DVB and α,β-tubulin is about -251.0 kJ·mol
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.