Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31460304›Full record

ArticleACS omega2019

Reactivity of (Vicinal) Carbonyl Compounds with Urea.

Jacobus A W Jong, Robert Smakman, Marc-Etienne Moret, Marianne C Verhaar, Wim E Hennink, Karin G F Gerritsen, Cornelus F Van Nostrum

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacobus A W JongDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS) and Organic Chemistry and Catalysis, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Robert SmakmanInnovista, Raadhuisstraat 1, 1393 NW Nigtevecht, The Netherlands.
Marc-Etienne MoretDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS) and Organic Chemistry and Catalysis, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marianne C VerhaarDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wim E HenninkDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS) and Organic Chemistry and Catalysis, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karin G F GerritsenDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelus F Van NostrumDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS) and Organic Chemistry and Catalysis, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urea removal from dialysate is the major obstacle in realization of a miniature dialysis device, based on continuous dialysate regeneration in a closed loop, used for the treatment of patients suffering from end-stage kidney disease. For the development of a polymeric urea sorbent, capable of removing urea from dialysate with high binding capacities and fast reaction kinetics, a systematic kinetic study was performed on the reactivity of urea with a library of low-molecular-weight carbonyl compounds in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) at 323 K. It was found that dialdehydes do not react with urea under these conditions but need to be activated under acidic conditions and require aldehyde groups in close proximity to each other to allow a reaction with urea. Among the 31 (hydrated) carbonyl compounds tested, triformylmethane, ninhydrin, and phenylglyoxaldehyde were the most reactive ones with urea. This is attributed to the low dehydration energies of these compounds, as calculated by Gibbs free energy differences between the hydrated and dehydrated carbonyl compounds, which are favorable for the reaction with urea. Therefore, future urea sorbents should contain such functional groups at the highest possible density.

Identifiers

PMID31460304
PMCPMC6681983
OpenAlexW2957039259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.