ArticleACS omega2019
Investigating the Time Response of an Optical pH Sensor Based on a Polysiloxane-Polyethylene Glycol Composite Material Impregnated with a pH-Responsive Triangulenium Dye.
Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microwave-assisted synthesis of new triangulenium dyes for lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- High-Performance Ratiometric Fluorescence pH Sensor Based on HPTS-IP/TiOJournal of fluorescence · 2025Article
- Dual-Lifetime Referencing (Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining the time it takes a sensor to report a change in the concentration of its target analyte may appear to be an easy task, but it is not. The dynamic characteristic of a sensor is determined by all components in the sensor system and the hydrodynamics of the sample. Here, the dynamic properties of an optical pH sensor were determined using the IUPAC-recommended activity step method in experimental setups that can determine sensor-limited response times longer than 5 s. In order to do so, experimental setups for the injection and for the dipping method of determining the sensor time response were developed, tested, and shown to be able to determine time-response curves with 1 s time resolution. This time resolution is shown to be sufficient for determining dynamic characterization of this optical pH sensor. The sensor chemistry-limited time-response curves were analyzed using curve fitting. It was found that the optode response time is limited by diffusion of protons within the sensor material when the proton concentration is reduced and limited by diffusion from the bulk to the boundary layer at the optode surface when proton concentration is increased. The latter is dependent on the magnitude of the change in analyte concentration and cannot be reported as a single response time. The investigation of the time response of the optical pH sensor reveals detailed information of the sensor chemistry, but does not yield a single response time of the sensor capable of describing the dynamic sensor characteristics of the optical pH sensor system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.