ArticleACS omega2019
Microfluidic Analysis for Separating and Measuring the Deformability of Cancer Cell Subpopulations.
Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deformation under flow and morphological recovery of cancer cells.Lab on a chip · 2024Article
- High-throughput mechanophenotyping of multicellular spheroids using a microfluidic micropipette aspiration chip.Lab on a chip · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increased deformability and softness endow tumor cells with highly invasive and metastatic capabilities. We exploited these characteristics to fabricate a high-throughput microfluidic device to measure cell deformability and separate cancer cells. Driven by hydrodynamic forces, the cells with better deformability passed through the chip faster, whereas stiffer cells passed through the device over a longer time period. The MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines were used to evaluate the device because their metastatic potentials were known. We found that MDA-MB-231 cells, which were softer and exhibited stronger deformability, passed through the device more quickly. HeLa cells were also successfully separated into softer and stiffer subpopulations, whose distinct mechanical properties were confirmed by atomic force microscopy. We also measured the expression of metastasis-associated proteins (epidermal growth factor receptor and integrin β 1) and found that subpopulations with varied deformabilities had different expression levels. Our results suggested that this high-throughput microfluidic device could be used to screen and evaluate the curative effects of drug and cancer progression by simultaneously testing cell deformability and expression levels of metastasis-associated proteins in separated cell subpopulations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.