ArticleACS omega2019
Simple Coordination Geometry Descriptors Allow to Accurately Predict Metal-Binding Sites in Proteins.
Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Collision Fingerprints (DCF): Introducing a New Descriptor Linking Lattice Interactions to 2D Structural Data Signatures.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Benchmarking Zinc-Binding Site Predictors: A Comparative Analysis of Structure-Based Approaches.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Identifying Metal Binding Sites in Proteins Using Homologous Structures, the MADE Approach.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Studying Peptide-Metal Ion Complex Structures by Solution-State NMR.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A reinforcement learning approach for protein-ligand binding pose prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Structural Bioinformatics and Deep Learning of Metalloproteins: Recent Advances and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Bioluminescence Color-Tuning Firefly Luciferases: Engineering and Prospects for Real-Time Intracellular pH Imaging and Heavy Metal Biosensing.Biosensors · 2022Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Computation-Based Metal-Binding Prediction Approaches at the Residue Level.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Biospeciation of Potential Vanadium Drugs of Acetylacetonate in the Presence of Proteins.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Article
- GPathFinder: Identification of Ligand-Binding Pathways by a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With more than a third of the genome encoding for metal-containing biomolecules, the in silico prediction of how metal ions bind to proteins is crucial in chemistry, biology, and medicine. To date, algorithms for metal-binding site prediction are mainly based on sequence analysis. Those methods have reached enough quality to predict the correct region of the protein and the coordinating residues involved in metal-binding, but they do not provide three-dimensional (3D) models. On the contrary, the prediction of accurate 3D models for protein-metal adducts by structural bioinformatics and molecular modeling techniques is still a challenge. Here, we present an update of our multipurpose molecular modeling suite, GaudiMM, to locate metal-binding sites in proteins. The approach is benchmarked on 105 X-ray structures with resolution lower than 2.0 Å. Results predict the correct binding site of the metal in the biological scaffold for all the entries in the data set. Generated 3D models of the protein-metal coordination complexes reach root-mean-square deviation values under 1.0 Å between calculated and experimental structures. The whole process is purely based on finding poses that satisfy metal-derived geometrical rules without needing sequence or fine electronic inputs. Additional post-optimizations, including receptor flexibility, have been tested and suggest that more extensive searches, required when the host structures present a low level of pre-organization, are also possible. With this new update, GaudiMM is now able to look for metal-binding sites in biological scaffolds and clearly shows how explicitly considering the geometric particularities of the first coordination sphere of the metal in a docking process provides excellent results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.