ArticleACS omega2019
Function Prediction for G Protein-Coupled Receptors through Text Mining and Induction Matrix Completion.
Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blinded Testing of Function Annotation for uPE1 Proteins by I-TASSER/COFACTOR Pipeline Using the 2018-2019 Additions to neXtProt and the CAFA3 Challenge.Journal of proteome research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the key component of cellular signal transduction. Accurately annotating the biological functions of GPCR proteins is vital to the understanding of the physiological processes they involve in. With the rapid development of text mining technologies and the exponential growth of biomedical literature, it becomes urgent to explore biological functional information from various literature for systematically and reliably annotating these known GPCRs. We design a novel three-stage approach, TM-IMC, using text mining and inductive matrix completion, for automated prediction of the gene ontology (GO) terms of the GPCR proteins. Large-scale benchmark tests show that inductive matrix completion models contribute to GPCR-GO association prediction for both molecular function and biological process aspects. Moreover, our detailed data analysis shows that information extracted from GPCR-associated literature indeed contributes to the prediction of GPCR-GO associations. The study demonstrated a new avenue to enhance the accuracy of GPCR function annotation through the combination of text mining and induction matrix completion over baseline methods in critical assessment of protein function annotation algorithms and literature-based GO annotation methods. Source codes of TM-IMC and the involved datasets can be freely downloaded from https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/TM-IMC for academic purposes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.