Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31459042›Full record

ArticleACS omega2018

Evaluation of Common Theoretical Methods for Predicting Infrared Multiphotonic Dissociation Vibrational Spectra of Intramolecular Hydrogen-Bonded Ions.

André F Rodrigues-Oliveira, Francisco W M Ribeiro, Gustavo Cervi, Thiago C Correra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Infrared Ion Spectroscopy of Gaseous [Cu(2,2'-Bipyridine)The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

André F Rodrigues-OliveiraDepartment of Fundamental Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, Avenue Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, 05508-000 São Paulo, Brazil.
Francisco W M RibeiroDepartment of Fundamental Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, Avenue Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, 05508-000 São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo CerviDepartment of Fundamental Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, Avenue Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, 05508-000 São Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago C CorreraDepartment of Fundamental Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, Avenue Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, 05508-000 São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infrared photodissociation analyses are supported by theoretical calculations that allow a trustworthy interpretation of experimental spectra of gaseous ions. B3LYP calculations are the most prominent method used to model IR spectra, as detailed in our bibliographic survey. However, this and other commonly used methods are known to provide inaccurate energy values and geometries, especially when it comes to long-range interactions, such as intramolecular H-bonds, which show increased anharmonicity. Therefore, we evaluated some of the most commonly used density functional theory methods (B3LYP, CAM-B3LYP, and M06-2X) and basis sets (6-31+G(d,p), 6-311++G(d,p), 6-311++G(3df,2pd), aug-cc-pVDZ, and aug-cc-pVTZ), including anharmonicity and dispersion corrections. The results were compared to MP2 calculations and to experimental high-frequency (2000-4000 cm

Identifiers

PMID31459042
PMCPMC6644661
OpenAlexW2885560748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.