ArticleACS omega2018
COSMO-RS-Based Screening of Antisolvents for the Separation of Sugars from Ionic Liquids: Experimental and Molecular Dynamic Simulations.
Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-driven generation and screening of potential ionic liquids for cellulose dissolution.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Unraveling the effect of choline-based choline based ionic liquids on the physicochemical properties and taste behavior of D( +)-glucose in aqueous solutions.BMC chemistry · 2025Article
- Multiscale molecular simulations for the solvation of lignin in ionic liquids.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of ionic liquids (ILs) in the biorefinery process has been increasing for the past few decades. In biorefinery, the separation process with respect to sugars needs to be evaluated for an efficient process design. Therefore, the present work aims to investigate the separation of sugars and ILs by means of a precipitation process using an antisolvent method. For this purpose, both theoretical and experimental studies were conducted. Initially, the conductor-like screening model for real solvents model was employed to screen the suitable antisolvents for the separation of sugars from the ILs. From the screening study, dichloromethane (DCM) and 1,2-dichloroethane were found to be the better antisolvents for the separation process. With the selected antisolvents, precipitation experiments were conducted for the mixtures involving four different sugars and three ILs at different experimental conditions. The process variables such as different antisolvents, sugars, ILs, antisolvent-IL molar ratios, and temperatures were examined in terms of their effect on sugar removal and IL recovery. DCM was found to be the most suitable antisolvent in this study with 90-99% of sugar removal and 80-98% of IL recovery. Further, molecular dynamics simulations were adopted to understand the structural properties of carbohydrates with ILs and antisolvents via interaction energies, hydrogen bonding, and coordination numbers. It was observed that the interaction energy between the sugars and IL plays a critical role in the removal of sugar. Higher the interaction energy between the sugars and IL, lower is the sugar removal.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.