Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31458805›Full record

ArticleACS omega2018

Chemically Enhanced Polymer-Coated Carbon Nanotube Electronic Gas Sensor for Isopropyl Alcohol Detection.

Yen H Ngo, Michael Brothers, Jennifer A Martin, Claude C Grigsby, Kathy Fullerton, Rajesh R Naik, Steve S Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Au/ZnO/InRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecularly imprinted polymersRSC advances · 2022
    Review
  6. Biomarkers and Detection Platforms for Human Health and Performance Monitoring: A Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yen H Ngo711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States.
Michael Brothers711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States.
Jennifer A Martin711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States.
Claude C Grigsby711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States.
Kathy Fullerton711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States.
Rajesh R Naik711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States.
Steve S Kim711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States.
United States Air Force Research Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breathing-air quality within commercial airline cabins has come under increased scrutiny because of the identification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the engine bleed air used to provide oxygen to cabins. Ideally, a sensor would be placed within the bleed air pipe itself, enabling detection before it permeated through and contaminated the entire cabin. Current gas-phase sensors suffer from issues with selectivity, do not have the appropriate form factor, or are too complex for commercial deployment. Here, we chose isopropyl alcohol (IPA), a main component of de-icer spray used in the aerospace community, as a target analyte: IPA exposure has been hypothesized to be a key component of aerotoxic syndrome in pre, during, and postflight. IPAs proposed mechanism of action is that of an anesthetic and central nervous system depressant. In this work, we describe IPA sensor development by showing (1) the integration of a polymer as an IPA capture matrix, (2) the adoption of a redox chemical additives as an IPA oxidizer, and (3) the application of carbon nanotubes as an electronic sensing conduit. We demonstrate the ability to not only detect IPA at 100-10 000 ppm in unfiltered, laboratory air but also discriminate among IPA, isoprene, and acetone, especially in comparison to a typical photoionization detector. Overall, we show an electronic device that operates at room temperature and responds preferentially to IPA, where the increase in the resistance corresponds directly to the concentration of IPA. Ultimately, this study opens up the pathway to selective electronic sensors that can enable real-time monitoring in a variety of environments for the force health prevention and protection, and the potential through future work to enable low parts-per-million and possibly high parts-per-billion selective detection of gas-phase VOCs of interest.

Identifiers

PMID31458805
PMCPMC6644726
OpenAlexW2805402904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.