ArticleACS omega2018
Influence of Hydrogen-Bonding Additives on Electrospinning of Cyclodextrin Nanofibers.
Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- In situ electrospinning at the operating table to immobilise mesenchymal stem cells on the bony wall for the regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Development and Evaluation of Indian Mustard Honey-Loaded Fast Dissolving PVA/AG Nanofibers for Enhanced Neuroprotection.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Transient Viscosity Adjustment Using a Coaxial Nozzle for Electrospinning Nanofibers from Non-Spinnable PurePolymers · 2024Article
- Unlocking multi-photon excited luminescence in pyrazolate trinuclear gold clusters for dynamic cell imaging.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Electrospun Scaffolds Enriched with Nanoparticle-Associated DNA: General Properties, DNA Release and Cell Transfection.Polymers · 2023Article
- Electrospinning Live Cells Using Gelatin and Pullulan.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The electrospinning of highly concentrated solutions of cyclodextrin (CD) leads to bead-free nanofibers without the need of a polymeric carrier. The occurrence of numerous hydrogen bonds among CD molecules is the main driving force for their electrospinning, and hence, additives with hydrogen-bonding potential can disturb the aggregation of CD molecules and affect their electrospinning. In this study, we systematically investigated the influence of five different hydrogen-bonding additives, i.e., methylamine (MA), ethylenediamine (ED), urea, 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE), and 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP), on the solution behavior of hydroxypropyl-β-CD (HP-β-CD) by rheology, conductivity, and NMR analyses, and the morphology of the electrospun HP-β-CD nanofibers by scanning electron microscopy. The
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.