Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31458221›Full record

ArticleACS omega2018

Conservation of Potentially Druggable Cavities in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Bin Chong, Maodong Li, Tong Li, Miao Yu, Yugang Zhang, Zhirong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. More is simpler: Decomposition of ligand-binding affinity for proteins being disordered.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The structure and phase of tau: from monomer to amyloid filament.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Protein Evolution in the Flaviviruses.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bin ChongCollege of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Center for Quantitative Biology, and Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Maodong LiCollege of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Center for Quantitative Biology, and Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Tong LiDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Miao YuCollege of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Center for Quantitative Biology, and Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Yugang ZhangDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, New York 14850, United States.
Zhirong LiuCollege of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Center for Quantitative Biology, and Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) exist in highly dynamic conformational ensembles, which pose a major obstacle for drug development targeting IDPs because traditional rational drug design relies on unique three-dimensional structures. Here, we analyzed the conservation (especially structural conservation) of potentially druggable cavities in 22 ensembles of IDPs. It was found that there is considerable conservation for potentially druggable cavities within each ensemble. The average common atom percentage of potentially druggable cavities is as high as 54%. The average root-mean-squared deviation of common atoms ranges between 1 and 8 Å for multichain IDPs, and a common pocket is kept after direct alignment of cavities. In addition, the conservation of potentially druggable cavities varies among different proteins. In the comparison of multi- and single-chain IDPs, some multichain IDPs have an extremely high conservation, whereas another multichain IDPs' conservation appears worse, and the single-chain IDPs have relatively moderate conservations. This study is a new attempt to generally assess the potentially druggable cavities in IDPs for taking IDPs as druggable targets, and this work also lends support to the opinion of IDPs tending to bind to "multiconformational affinity" compounds.

Identifiers

PMID31458221
PMCPMC6643371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.