ArticleACS omega2017
Excess Volumes from the Pressure Derivative of the Excess Chemical Potential: Testing Simple Models for Cavity Formation in Water.
Article in ACS omega, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Excess volumes and excess compressibilities for hard spheres in water were computed by pressure derivatives of the excess chemical potential, which is equivalent to the work of cavity formation. This is relevant to the application of continuum solvation methods at various pressures. The excess chemical potential was modeled within phenomenological expressions for curved surfaces plus a pressure-volume term, for which two approaches were adopted, differing for the radius of the spherical volume. This implies a different dependence on pressure of parameters. In all cases, in the surface term, for the pressure derivative of parameters of the curvature function, use was made of the previously proposed expressions for the first two moments obtained from the density and radial distribution of oxygens in liquid water. Only for the parameter which has the dimension of surface tension (γ̃) was explicit dependence on pressure considered and results are affected by the specific polynomial used. In agreement with what inferred from simulation results obtained for cavities in TIP4P water, negative and positive adsorptions at the contact radius were extrapolated for a very large cavity at 1 and 8000 atm, respectively. The expressions here employed for the excess chemical potential predict the zero value of asymptotic adsorption to be at a pressure between 500 and 800 atm, which can be compared to results from the revised scaled particle theory. In the same range, for a nanometer-sized cavity, a change of behavior occurs regarding the ratio between the excess Helmholtz free energy and the product between pressure and excess volume.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.