ArticleIranian journal of biotechnology2018
Prediction of Protein Sub-Mitochondria Locations Using Protein Interaction Networks.
Article in Iranian journal of biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- SubmitoLoc: Identification of mitochondrial sub cellular locations of proteins using support vector machine.Bioinformation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrediction of the protein localization is among the most important issues in the bioinformatics that is used for the prediction of the proteins in the cells and organelles such as mitochondria. In this study, several machine learning algorithms are applied for the prediction of the intracellular protein locations. These algorithms use the features extracted from protein sequences. In contrast, protein interactions have been less investigated.
objectivesAs protein interactions usually occur in the same or adjacent places, using this feature to find the location would be efficient and impressive. This study did not aim at increasing the total accuracy of the conducted research. The study has focused on the features of the proteins' interaction and their employment which lead to a higher accuracy. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, we have examined the protein interaction network as one of the features for prediction of the protein localization and its effects on the prediction results. In this regards, we have gathered some of the most common features including Amino Acid Composition, Dipeptide Compositions, Pseudo Amino Acid Compositions (PseAAC), Position Specific Scoring Matrix (PSSM), Functional Domain, Gene Ontology information, and the Pair-wise sequence alignment. The results of the classification are compared to the ones using protein interactions. For achieving this goal different machine learning algorithms were tested.
resultsThe best-obtained results of using single feature set obtained using SVM classifier for PseAAC feature. The accuracy of combining all features with PPI data, using the Decision Tree and Random Forest classifiers, was 82.49% and 83.35%, respectively. In another experiment, using just protein interaction data with the different cutting points resulted in obtaining an accuracy of 93.035% for the protein location prediction.
conclusionIn total, it was shown that protein(s) interaction has a significant impact on the prediction of the mitochondrial proteins' location. This feature can separately distinguish the locations well. Using this feature the accuracy of the results is raised up to 5%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.