Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31456873›Full record

Article2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics Workshops : proceedings : 4-7 June 2018, New York, NY. International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (6th : 2018 : New York, N.Y.). Workshops2018

Assessing Mental Health Signals among Sexual and Gender Minorities using Twitter Data.

Yunpeng Zhao, Yi Guo, Xing He, Jinhai Huo, Yonghui Wu, Xi Yang, Jiang Bian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics Workshops : proceedings : 4-7 June 2018, New York, NY. International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (6th : 2018 : New York, N.Y.). Workshops, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yunpeng Zhao *Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics.
Yi Guo *Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics.
Xing HeDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics.
Jinhai HuoDepartment of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Yonghui WuDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics.
Xi YangDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics.
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual and gender minorities' (SGMs) mental health needs remain little understood. Because of stigma and discrimination, SGMs are often unwilling to self-identify and reluctant to participate in traditional surveys. On the other hand, social media platforms have brought rapid changes to the health communication landscape and provided us a new data source for health surveillance of vulnerable populations. In this study, we explored machine learning methods to identify SGM individuals through finding their self-identifying tweets; then, applied a lexicon-based text analysis method to extract emotion and mental health signals from SGMs' Twitter timelines. We found that 1) SGM people have expressed more negative feelings in their tweets, and 2) within SGM populations, gay and genderfluid individuals tend to use more words related to negative emotions, anger, anxiety, and sadness in their tweets.

Indexed as

mental healthsexual and gender minoritiessocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID31456873
PMCPMC6711604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.