Coil-helix transition of polypeptide at water-lipid interface.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Aiming the magic bullet: targeted delivery of imaging and therapeutic agents to solid tumors by pHLIP peptides.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
   Review
2. Kinetics of pHLIP peptide insertion into and exit from a membrane.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
   Article
3. Peptides of pHLIP family for targeted intracellular and extracellular delivery of cargo molecules to tumors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
   Article
4. pHLIP Peptide Interaction with a Membrane Monitored by SAXS.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract