Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31456799›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2019

A Sample-Sparing Multiplexed ADCP Assay.

Audrey L Butler, Jonathan K Fallon, Galit Alter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Optimizing delivery in a multivalent subunit influenza vaccine using mixed polymeric microparticle degradation rates.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Audrey L ButlerThe Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jonathan K FallonThe Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Galit AlterThe Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard · US

Funding

Demystifying the antiviral activity of the IgG3+ antibody responseR37AI080289 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ALTER, GALIT · 2015 to 2022
$5.8M
Demystifying the antiviral activity of the IgG3+ antibody responseR01AI080289 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JUELG, BORIS DOMINIK · 2009 to 2024
$4.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI080289NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI080289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies serve as the primary correlate of protection following most clinically approved vaccines and are thought to confer protection in part through their ability to block (neutralize) infection. Increasingly, studies have shown that beyond their blocking activities, the ability of antibodies to leverage the innate immune response may serve a vital role in protection from infection. Specifically, antibodies can drive phagocytosis, complement activation, and cellular cytotoxicity by interacting with Fc-receptors found on all innate immune cells. Measuring the capacity of antibodies to induce these functions has become critical for the identification of correlates of protection in large-scale vaccine trials. Therefore, there is a growing need to develop robust, high throughput assays able to interrogate the functional capacity of innate immune recruiting antibodies. However, in many instances, only small sample volumes are available. Nevertheless, profiling antibody functions across many pathogen-associated antigens or across global intra-pathogen variants is in high demand, making sample sparing approaches to perform this antibody evaluation critical. Here we describe the development of an approach to interrogate the functional activity of antibodies in serum against up to 5 antigen targets simultaneously. A single bead-based cellular assay was adapted to accommodate 5 different fluorescently colored beads, allowing for the concurrent investigation of antibody responses directed against multiple antigens in a single well. The multiplexed assay was as sensitive, specific, and accurate as the single antigen assay and robustly able to assess functional differences mediated by antibodies across different samples. These findings show multiplexing allows for accurate and more efficient analysis of antibody-mediated effector profiles.

Indexed as

Antigen-Antibody ReactionsImmunologic TechniquesAntibodiesAntigensCohort StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansImmunity, HumoralImmunogenicity, VaccinePhagocytosisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTHP-1 CellsAntibodiesAntigensantibody-mediated effector profilesdependent effector functionmonocytemultiplexphagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID31456799
PMCPMC6700248
OpenAlexW2963587856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.