ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019
A New Single Gene Differential Biomarker for
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- New genetic biomarkers from transcriptome RNA-sequencing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and Mycobacterium avium complex infections by bioinformatics analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optimization of real-time PCR protocols from lymph node bovine tissue for direct detection ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Effect ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Simultaneous detection and differentiation ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2023Article
- The Homologous Gene of Chromosomal Virulence D (Infection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- Clinical characteristics of patients with non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a seven-year follow-up study conducted in a certain tertiary hospital in Beijing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Culture-Independent PCR Detection and Differentiation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Prevalence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria among previously treated TB patients in the Gulf of Guinea, Africa.IJID regions · 2022Article
- Infection of a Free-Living Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria: Molecular and Physiological Bases of Virulence and Adaptation to Ecological Niches.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- Towards next-generation diagnostics for tuberculosis: identification of novel molecular targets by large-scale comparative genomics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Fundamental Cell Morphologies Examined With Cryo-TEM of the Species in the Novel Five Genera Robustly Correlate With New Classification in FamilyFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) and non-tuberculous mycobacteriosis are serious threats to health worldwide. A simple non-sequencing method is needed for rapid diagnosis, especially in less experienced hospitals, but there is no specific biomarker commonly used for all mycobacteria. The
methodsA total of 7294 mycobacterial genomes and 14 complete genomes of other families belonging to
resultsThe
conclusionThe Ku protein existed before the differentiation of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.