Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31456491›Full record

Observational studyJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2019

Comparison of Prostaglandin Analog Treatment Patterns in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.

Ji Haeng Heo, Karen L Rascati, James P Wilson, Kenneth A Lawson, Kristin M Richards, Radhika Nair

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Persistence with medical glaucoma therapy in newly diagnosed patients.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ji Haeng HeoHealth Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, and Genesis Research, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Karen L RascatiHealth Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin.
James P WilsonHealth Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin.
Kenneth A LawsonHealth Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin.
Kristin M RichardsHealth Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin.
Radhika NairHumana, Louisville, Kentucky.
The University of Texas at Austin · USHumana (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstaglandin analogs (PGAs) are considered an initial therapy to manage increased intraocular pressure (IOP) for patients with glaucoma. When the initial PGA treatment fails to lower IOP adequately, the patient may add or change medications or have surgery/laser treatment.

objectiveTo compare medication adherence, duration of therapy, and treatment patterns among 3 PGAs-latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost-as initial therapies for patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data. The cohort consisted of patients newly diagnosed with glaucoma or ocular hypertension with at least 1 prescription claim for latanoprost, travoprost, or bimatoprost and enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan between 2007 and 2012. The 24-month medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to measure medication adherence. Discontinuation of first-line PGA therapy was defined as nonpersistence (90-day gap allowance) of the index PGA or a change in therapy during the 24-month follow-up period. Types of second-line therapy (i.e., switch, addition, and surgery) were identified. The 1:1:1 propensity score matching was used.

resultsPatients who met the inclusion criteria were propensity score matched, resulting in 1,296 patients per PGA group. Latanoprost users showed higher adherence (50.1%) than travoprost (48.8%) and bimatoprost (43.0%) users. The latanoprost and travoprost groups had significantly higher MPRs than bimatoprost (

conclusionsPatients who used latanoprost as their initial therapy were more likely to adhere and persist to the index PGA compared with bimatoprost users. The latanoprost group demonstrated a lower risk of discontinuing first-line therapy than the travoprost and bimatoprost groups. The results may assist ophthalmologists in determining the optimal management of this patient population with respect to treatment patterns. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. All authors except Heo and Nair are employed by The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy. Heo was with the Health Outcomes Division, The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy during a portion of this study and is employed by Genesis Research. Nair is employed by Humana. The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. This study was presented as a poster at the 2016 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Annual Meeting, May 2016, Washington, DC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMedicareMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedOcular HypertensionProstaglandins, SyntheticRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAntihypertensive AgentsProstaglandins, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID31456491
PMCPMC10398081
OpenAlexW2970403782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.