Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31456385›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019

Second-harmonic generation directionality is associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer core needle biopsies.

Danielle E Desa, Monisha Bhanote, Robert L Hill, Joseph B Majeski, Brandon Buscaglia, Marcus D'Aguiar, Robert Strawderman, David G Hicks, Bradley M Turner, Edward B Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Danielle E DesaUniversity of Rochester, Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Biomedical, United States.
Monisha BhanoteUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Pathology an, United States.
Robert L HillHarmonigenic Corporation, Rochester, New York, United States.
Joseph B MajeskiUniversity of Rochester, Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Biomedical, United States.
Brandon BuscagliaRochester Institute of Technology, Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Eng, United States.
Marcus D'AguiarRochester Institute of Technology, Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Eng, United States.
Robert StrawdermanUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Biostatistic, United States.
David G HicksUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Pathology an, United States.
Bradley M TurnerUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Pathology an, United States.
Edward B BrownUniversity of Rochester, Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Biomedical, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is routinely administered to subsets of breast cancer patients, including triple negative (TN) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) cancers. After NACT and subsequent surgical resection, 5% to 30% of patients have no residual invasive carcinoma, termed pathological complete response. Unfortunately, many patients experience little-to-no response after NACT and unnecessarily suffer its side effects. Methods are needed to predict an individual patient’s response to NACT. Core needle biopsies, taken before NACT, consist of tumor cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix. We performed second-harmonic generation (SHG) imaging of fibrillar collagen in core needle biopsy sections as a possible predictor of response to NACT. The ratio of forward-to-backward scattering (F/B) SHG was assessed in the “tumor bulk” and “tumor–host interface” in HER2+ and TN core needle biopsy sections. Patient response was classified post-treatment using the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score. In HER2+ biopsies, RCB class was associated with F/B derived from the tumor–stromal interface, but not tumor bulk. F/B was not associated with RCB class in TN biopsies. These findings suggest that F/B from needle biopsy sections may be a useful predictor of which patients will respond favorably to NACT, with the potential to help reduce overtreatment.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleBiopsy, NeedleBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCollagenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesExtracellular MatrixFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisScattering, RadiationTreatment OutcomeTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCollagenERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesbreast cancercollagenextracellular matrixmultiphoton laser scanning microscopyneoadjuvant chemotherapysecond-harmonic generation

Identifiers

PMID31456385
PMCPMC6983524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.