Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31456361›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

Refinement of risk stratification for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma using FOXO1 fusion status in addition to established clinical outcome predictors: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Emily Hibbitts, Yueh-Yun Chi, Douglas S Hawkins, Frederic G Barr, Julie A Bradley, Roshni Dasgupta, William H Meyer, David A Rodeberg, Erin R Rudzinski, Sheri L Spunt and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sarcomas in Adolescents and Young Adults.Current oncology reports · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Oncotarget · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Emily HibbittsDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-2400-5469
Yueh-Yun ChiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Douglas S HawkinsDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Frederic G BarrLaboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Julie A BradleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville, Florida.
Roshni DasguptaDivision of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
William H MeyerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
David A RodebergDepartment of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Erin R RudzinskiDepartment of Laboratories, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Sheri L SpuntDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1669-2676
Stephen X SkapekDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Suzanne L WoldenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York.
Carola A S ArndtDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Seattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Florida · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USEast Carolina University · USMayo Clinic · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USStanford University · USUniversity of Florida Health Science Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, JAMES R · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
COG NCTN Solid Malignancy Integrated Translational Science CenterU10CA180884 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ADAMSON, PETER C., SKAPEK, STEPHEN X · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U10CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10CA180884NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899Seattle Children's Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies of the prognostic importance of FOXO1 fusion status in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) have had conflicting results. We re-examined risk stratification by adding FOXO1 status to traditional clinical prognostic factors in children with localized or metastatic RMS.

methodsData from six COG clinical trials (D9602, D9802, D9803, ARST0331, ARTS0431, ARST0531; two studies each for low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients) accruing previously untreated patients with RMS from 1997 to 2013 yielded 1727 evaluable patients. Survival tree regression for event-free survival (EFS) was conducted to recursively select prognostic factors for branching and split. Factors included were age, FOXO1, clinical group, histology, nodal status, number of metastatic sites, primary site, sex, tumor size, and presence of metastases in bone/bone marrow, soft tissue, effusions, lung, distant lymph nodes, and other sites. Definition and outcome of the proposed risk groups were compared to existing systems and cross-validated results.

resultsThe 5-year EFS and overall survival (OS) for evaluable patients were 69% and 79%, respectively. Extent of disease (localized versus metastatic) was the first split (EFS 73% vs 30%; OS 84% vs. 42%). FOXO1 status (positive vs negative) was significant in the second split both for localized (EFS 52% vs 78%; OS 65% vs 88%) and metastatic disease (EFS 6% vs 46%; OS 19% vs 58%).

conclusionsAfter metastatic status, FOXO1 status is the most important prognostic factor in patients with RMS and improves risk stratification of patients with localized RMS. Our findings support incorporation of FOXO1 status in risk stratified clinical trials.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolDisease ProgressionFemaleForkhead Box Protein O1HumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOncogene Proteins, FusionPrognosisRhabdomyosarcomaRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, TumorForkhead Box Protein O1FOXO1 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, Fusionfusion statusrhabdomyosarcomarisk stratificationsurvival tree regression

Identifiers

PMID31456361
PMCPMC6797586
OpenAlexW2970427574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.