Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31456044›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2019

[Treatment of osteoporosis in the outpatient field : Possibilities and challenges].

C Niedhart, C Karrenberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Osteoporosis-risk evaluation and case finding].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C NiedhartOsteologisches Schwerpunktzentrum, Liecker Str. 23, 52525, Heinsberg, Deutschland. cniedhart@gmx.de.
C KarrenbergOrthopädische Praxis, Hauptstr. 17, 51503, Rösrath, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the high incidence of osteoporosis, the high risk of subsequent fractures after an initial fracture and effective treatment options, there is a substantial deficit in the diagnostics and treatment of patients suffering from osteoporosis in Germany and worldwide. The reasons for this are multifactorial and can be attributed to physicians and patients as well as mismanagement inherent to the system. This article provides an overview of the challenges in the treatment of osteoporosis patients and shows the possibilities for improvement of care in the outpatient area. With respect to the exact schedule of the diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis, reference is made to the pocket-sized edition of the current guidelines of the Governing Body Osteology (DVO).

Indexed as

OutpatientsFractures, BoneGermanyHumansOsteologyOsteoporosisEngagementHealthcare modelsInterface problemsPatient identificationTreatment adherence

Identifiers

PMID31456044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.