ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
Factors associated with surgeon's perception of distraction in the operating room.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between quality of work life and distractions in operating room nurses: a correlational study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Identification of the Relationship Between Health Professionals' Managerial Attitudes and Distractions in the Operating Room: A Mixed Design Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Surgical interruptions and preventable delays in the operating rooms of academic teaching hospitals.Patient safety in surgery · 2025Article
- Safe technology use in the operating room and related factors.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The contribution of surgical data science to identifying intraoperative human errors and adverse events in elective liver surgery: A preliminary study.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025Article
- Influence of Distraction Factors on Performance in Laparoscopic Surgery in Immersive Virtual Reality: Study Protocol of a Cross-Over Trial in Medical Students and Residents-DisLapVR.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023Article
- Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Observational
- Unpacking the Broad Landscape of Intraoperative Stressors for Clinical Personnel: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Review
- Non-technical skills and device-related interruptions in minimally invasive surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- The effect of intraoperative distractions on severe technical events in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Perceived Surgeon Stress During No-Sedation Topical Phacoemulsification.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDistractions in the operating room (OR) can create stress among surgeons and lead to higher chances of errors and adverse events. The objective is to determine intraoperative factors that are associated with surgeons' perception of distraction.
methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study in 265 consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic general surgery during the 2 years after the implementation of a data capture system called the OR Black Box to identify intraoperative sources of distraction. At the end of each operation, human-factor surveys were administered to assess whether surgeons felt distracted. Using a multivariable logistic model, we determined which intraoperative sources of distraction were associated with the surgeons feeling distracted in the OR.
resultsThe attending surgeon reported feeling distracted in 120 of 265 operations (45%). Auditory sources of distraction, such as the OR door opening occurred at a median of 41 times per case (interquartile range (IQR), 32-54). Cognitive distractions such as teaching (142 cases (54%)), device malfunction (91 (34%)), irrelevant conversations (72 (27%)), management of the next case (41 (15%)), and time pressure (22 (8%)) occurred in a significant number of operations. In a multivariable analysis, presence of irrelevant conversations (odds ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-3.94, p = 0.015) and patient history of previous abdominal surgery (odds ratio 2.2, 95% CI 1.18-4.1, p = 0.013) were independently associated with increased likelihood of the surgeons feeling distracted.
conclusionsIrrelevant conversation in the OR is a modifiable factor that was independently associated with surgeon's perception of distraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31456026What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.