Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31456026›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Factors associated with surgeon's perception of distraction in the operating room.

James J Jung, Jonah Elfassy, Teodor Grantcharov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James J JungInternational Centre for Surgical Safety, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, 8th Floor East, Toronto, ON, M5B 1T8, Canada. jungj@smh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1133-6322
Jonah ElfassyInternational Centre for Surgical Safety, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, 8th Floor East, Toronto, ON, M5B 1T8, Canada.
Teodor GrantcharovInternational Centre for Surgical Safety, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, 8th Floor East, Toronto, ON, M5B 1T8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistractions in the operating room (OR) can create stress among surgeons and lead to higher chances of errors and adverse events. The objective is to determine intraoperative factors that are associated with surgeons' perception of distraction.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study in 265 consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic general surgery during the 2 years after the implementation of a data capture system called the OR Black Box to identify intraoperative sources of distraction. At the end of each operation, human-factor surveys were administered to assess whether surgeons felt distracted. Using a multivariable logistic model, we determined which intraoperative sources of distraction were associated with the surgeons feeling distracted in the OR.

resultsThe attending surgeon reported feeling distracted in 120 of 265 operations (45%). Auditory sources of distraction, such as the OR door opening occurred at a median of 41 times per case (interquartile range (IQR), 32-54). Cognitive distractions such as teaching (142 cases (54%)), device malfunction (91 (34%)), irrelevant conversations (72 (27%)), management of the next case (41 (15%)), and time pressure (22 (8%)) occurred in a significant number of operations. In a multivariable analysis, presence of irrelevant conversations (odds ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-3.94, p = 0.015) and patient history of previous abdominal surgery (odds ratio 2.2, 95% CI 1.18-4.1, p = 0.013) were independently associated with increased likelihood of the surgeons feeling distracted.

conclusionsIrrelevant conversation in the OR is a modifiable factor that was independently associated with surgeon's perception of distraction.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyOperating RoomsAttentionClinical CompetenceElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleGastric BypassHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPerceptionProspective StudiesSurgeonsTime FactorsDistractionHuman factorsPatient safety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.