Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31455998›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Influence of neurovascular mechanisms on response to tDCS: an exploratory study.

Pooja C Iyer, Alexander Rosenberg, Tracy Baynard, Sangeetha Madhavan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pooja C IyerGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1599-8531
Alexander RosenbergDepartment of Physiology and Anatomy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Tracy BaynardIntegrative Physiology Laboratory, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sangeetha MadhavanBrain Plasticity Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. smadhava@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6086-0027
University of Illinois Chicago · USIllinois College · USUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

Cortical priming to optimize gait rehabilitation post strokeR01HD075777 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MADHAVAN, SANGEETHA · 2014 to 2024
$4.1M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD075777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The beneficial effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for stroke rehabilitation are limited by the variability in changes in corticomotor excitability (CME) after tDCS. Neuronal activity is closely related to cerebral blood flow; however, the cerebral hemodynamics of neuromodulation in relation to neural effects have been less explored. In this study, we examined the effects of tDCS on cerebral blood velocity (CBv) in chronic stroke survivors using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound in relation to changes in CME and described the neurovascular characteristics of tDCS responders. Middle cerebral artery (MCA) CBv, cerebrovascular resistance (CVRi) and other cerebral hemodynamics-related variables were continuously measured before and after 15 min of 1 mA anodal tDCS to the lesioned lower limb M1. tDCS did not modulate CBv in the whole group and upon TMS-based stratification of responders and non-responders. However, at baseline, responders demonstrated lower CME levels, lower CBv and higher CVRi as compared to non-responders. These results indicate a possible difference in baseline CME and CBv in tDCS responders that may influence their response to neuromodulation. Future trials with a large sample size and repeated baseline measurements may help validate these findings and establish a relationship between neuromodulation and neurovascular mechanisms in stroke.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAgedBlood Flow VelocityCerebral CortexCerebrovascular CirculationChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Cerebral ArteryNeurovascular CouplingStrokeSurvivorsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialCerebral blood velocityChronic strokeCorticomotor excitabilityNon-respondersRespondersTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31455998
OpenAlexW2970941430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.