Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31455744›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Take a deep breath: Multiecho fMRI denoising effectively removes head motion artifacts, obviating the need for global signal regression.

R Nathan Spreng, Sara Fernández-Cabello, Gary R Turner, W Dale Stevens

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Connectivity analyses for task-based fMRI.Physics of life reviews · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Age differences in the functional architecture of the human brain.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reply to Spreng et al.: Multiecho fMRI denoising does not remove global motion-associated respiratory signals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Nathan SprengLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, Montreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; nathan.spreng@gmail.com stevensd@yorku.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1530-8916
Sara Fernández-CabelloLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, Montreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.
Gary R TurnerDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
W Dale StevensDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada nathan.spreng@gmail.com stevensd@yorku.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6365-4859

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1233CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ArtifactsMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain MappingHeadMotion

Identifiers

PMID31455744
PMCPMC6765232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.