Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31455738›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Idiosyncratic neural coding and neuromodulation of olfactory individuality in

Kyle S Honegger, Matthew A-Y Smith, Matthew A Churgin, Glenn C Turner, Benjamin L de Bivort

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Division of labour in colony defence in a clonal ant.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reward expectations direct learning and drive operant matching inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle S HoneggerDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Matthew A-Y SmithDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Matthew A ChurginDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Glenn C TurnerJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147.
Benjamin L de BivortDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; debivort@oeb.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USLurie Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innate behavioral biases and preferences can vary significantly among individuals of the same genotype. Though individuality is a fundamental property of behavior, it is not currently understood how individual differences in brain structure and physiology produce idiosyncratic behaviors. Here we present evidence for idiosyncrasy in olfactory behavior and neural responses in

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainCalciumDrosophilaFemaleIndividualityNeuronsOdorantsSmellCalciumindividualityneural encodingneuromodulationodor preferencesensory stimuli

Identifiers

PMID31455738
PMCPMC7519279
OpenAlexW2970500135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.